Percentage Voter Turnout Above (Below) Expected
Versus Number of Registered Voters
California Primary Election, June 4, 2014
Results available at http://tinyurl.com/l3xbpqw
that the northern counties, and those of the Sierra foothills should really hold the title.
I've wanted to revisit the final results for a while. I did so today. The coefficient of determination was essentially unchanged (R²=.757 versus R²=.758). In doing so, though, I realized there was a way to get at the point Paul Mitchell, the vice-president of Political Data Inc., had made to the newspaper reporter that led to my post in the first place.
Paul had contended that "[p]oor people from Sonoma are far more likely to cast a ballot than someone living in poverty in Echo Park [Los Angeles]." This time, after plotting the results, I then set the y-axis to 100% of turnout as predicted by the trend line, leaving the x-axis at the number of registered voters per county. Graphing the data this way actually supports Paul's argument – that Sonoma County is the outlier from the trend. Sonoma County comes in at 137% of expected turnout, the highest in the table.
Voter turnout has been on my mind because of a line from Serrano v. Priest that's come up here before. In contemporary discussions of education, the "twin themes" of the Serrano I decision tend to be collapsed into one – "[t]he pivotal position of education to success in American society." But it is the second of the twin themes, where Serrano I finds its support in Brown v. Board of Education, that causes me to return to this data.
I hand the microphone to California's former governor, circa 1954:
"[E]ducation is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments. Compulsory school attendance laws and the great expenditures for education both demonstrate our recognition of the importance of education to our democratic society. It is required in the performance of our most basic public responsibilities, even service in the armed forces. It is the very foundation of good citizenship." [Emphasis added.]The language is lofty, but not complicated. Democratic society is (of course) based on voting. In performing that public responsibility, education is a lens allowing us to distinguish the differences between competing choices. But Earl Warren (and a unanimous Supreme Court behind him) say it's more – that education is the foundation of good citizenship. Education doesn't just help us when we step into the voting booth, it shows when we choose to go to the polls in the first place. Education is the self-evident spark, pump primer, and boot loader of democracy.
And so I take that proposition, and come back to the graph once more. And I ask myself – is it education in Sonoma County that has led to this result?
And if I accept for a moment that the statement is true, I then must turn to the far more difficult question. For what, then, would I point to about Sonoma County that has made this difference?
And what can the rest of California learn from Sonoma's experience?