"News Adventures" The Economist, December 8, 2012 available at http://tinyurl.com/az8vcfv |
The close connection between local businesses and a newspaper built on advertising meant many small towns had an essentially conservative institution that nonetheless valued ideas and the importance of the 1st Amendment. The small town newspaper could therefore be an important bulwark against insularity and parochialism across the United States.
The new economic model, though, is different; it is based on subscriptions, not advertising. The newspaper must now cater to its readers to a greater degree, and potentially their prejudices. The Economist points to the future of newspapers as being similar to the future of radio, in a somewhat unconcerned fashion.
It is understating the matter to suggest that there are merely "critics" of the changes to radio.
Of course the counter-majoritarian feature of media in general has not gone away; the reasons businesses need to reach customers have not changed, merely the vehicle has (Google or Facebook, instead of the New York Times). However, there is a greatly diminished local element to such technologies -- one of the cast of characters in a small town, the newspaper editor, has no analogue for a web site.
This has happened in other industries -- the local banker has been replaced with a Director of Business Development dispatched from the city, and a nurse-practicioner working at a distant HMO's facility substitutes for the local GP. The services (banking, health care, advertising) are perhaps provided more economically, but the open question is whether the community is diminished when its most powerful, insightful, and respected members, the banker, the editor and the doctor, are subjected to new economic pressures from unexpected directions. The radio model, thus, should be cause for concern for newspapers -- it may be more a poisoned chalice rather than a magical elixir.